many years ago, back in the eighties, had the bright idea to create something that would serve to control companies nationwide.
Thus, any move to do, buy or sell, they would find out quickly because both the buyer and the seller, would be presented to his statement bills to give back the more they had paid.
was a good idea, but the smartest, played with the picaresque to offer their products or services so that, the consumer, it came out much cheaper.
And for a long time, it was using such a system in which beneficiaries out sellers who had no bills in his statement and earned black and clean money. And buyers or those receiving this service by not paying VAT, they got much cheaper the product or work they had done, so they had profited too.
VAT, which had to apply to all financial transaction, service or sale, was religiously paid by the consumer, so they paid the total of what the product cost, plus VAT as a percentage of corresponding for this product, being more or less expensive if you have gone through more or less intermediate.
For instance, the kilo of apples or pears, which the farmer received 10 cents, is that when it comes to the store and we buy, we find that costs 2 euros.
Of course, the fault is neither the farmer nor the consumer. Blame it on the four, three or seven intermediaries, imposed on products by 200, 300 or 500 percent. And it's over, take advantage of a company have "legal" and speculative, adding to those prices.
And the truth is that absence of these intermediaries, the farmer, the farmer or in short, that it works, would have more profit margin. On the other hand, the consumer would see their basket price decline.
all know that not everything is so easy and that there is a transport. And that is necessary for a company to take over the management until it reaches the supermarket and the consumer. And also, for every step that goes by that kilo of fruit, it is more expensive for the benefits that you have to take each one goes through this kilo of fruit. And all this, we must add the VAT ...
Still, if this whole process had been done with good commercial management, the 12 cents for the consumer in the supermarket, increasing to about 50 cents.
And the $ 2 that we are paying now.
The solution is simple and only a matter of applying it in perspective.
I leave a trail ...
one hand, limit the percentage of brokers and reduce the number of these speculators, without labor, receive large amounts of money to the detriment of consumers' pockets.
To do so would require that the Government acted upon, and create a Consumer Research Unit (Jobs), which is responsible for analyzing and monitoring the entire process, ensuring a more fair and affordable price for the consumer.
Nobody has stopped to think that on balance, a tax which was originally created to control the companies, is the most burden on all citizens.
Businesses, I just assumed a formality, with a simple declaration of VAT, returns.
However, where the consumer has no deductible, and go where you go or buy what you buy, you are paying a price that product far superior to what really matters.
And it affects all ordinary citizens, who do not have a business, those with fewer economic resources, retirees, workers, the majority ...
And no matter which is a staple or staples, although some products pay less percentage, yet are paid much, you pay more.
So, as the VAT, even more speculative others, with name, should take steps to stop this growth precios.Y is that VAT has to stop being another intermediary.
should stop high prices to consumers and should be taken in perspective to the companies on one side and the consumer otro.Es, if VAT is charged to companies and they charge other companies, I think it's great idea, as are the same and have the option of tax.
Well for that you created to control the companies.
But now comes the second part, the consumer.
To the consumer, would be taken into more consideration and is the biggest loser so far out.
And the solution is very simple, very simple ...
The consumer only and only had to pay the first tax and VAT not all of the other intermediaries through which the product has passed down to our hands.
I repeat for those who govern us, whether a political party or another, I do not care.
The consumer only and exclusively have to pay the first tax, which, the first VAT would be included in a section of bills, although that product has passed by a thousand hands, a thousand businesses, because that first VAT, which would have to pay the consumer. Take careful note
Lords of the Government of Spain, we the English, we want you to do things right, do not deceive us, defend us and when you see something wrong, or you've done or other wrong, correct them, that we, the English of a standing, not to blame for the mismanagement that have made each other rulers.
And believe me, this is one of the greatest evils that drag consumers and makes overflow prices.
take steps now, to charge the consumer only the first VAT, which we, the people will notice it and appreciate it.
Did no one think and head?
Thus, any move to do, buy or sell, they would find out quickly because both the buyer and the seller, would be presented to his statement bills to give back the more they had paid.
was a good idea, but the smartest, played with the picaresque to offer their products or services so that, the consumer, it came out much cheaper.
And for a long time, it was using such a system in which beneficiaries out sellers who had no bills in his statement and earned black and clean money. And buyers or those receiving this service by not paying VAT, they got much cheaper the product or work they had done, so they had profited too.
VAT, which had to apply to all financial transaction, service or sale, was religiously paid by the consumer, so they paid the total of what the product cost, plus VAT as a percentage of corresponding for this product, being more or less expensive if you have gone through more or less intermediate.
For instance, the kilo of apples or pears, which the farmer received 10 cents, is that when it comes to the store and we buy, we find that costs 2 euros.
Of course, the fault is neither the farmer nor the consumer. Blame it on the four, three or seven intermediaries, imposed on products by 200, 300 or 500 percent. And it's over, take advantage of a company have "legal" and speculative, adding to those prices.
And the truth is that absence of these intermediaries, the farmer, the farmer or in short, that it works, would have more profit margin. On the other hand, the consumer would see their basket price decline.
all know that not everything is so easy and that there is a transport. And that is necessary for a company to take over the management until it reaches the supermarket and the consumer. And also, for every step that goes by that kilo of fruit, it is more expensive for the benefits that you have to take each one goes through this kilo of fruit. And all this, we must add the VAT ...
Still, if this whole process had been done with good commercial management, the 12 cents for the consumer in the supermarket, increasing to about 50 cents.
And the $ 2 that we are paying now.
The solution is simple and only a matter of applying it in perspective.
I leave a trail ...
one hand, limit the percentage of brokers and reduce the number of these speculators, without labor, receive large amounts of money to the detriment of consumers' pockets.
To do so would require that the Government acted upon, and create a Consumer Research Unit (Jobs), which is responsible for analyzing and monitoring the entire process, ensuring a more fair and affordable price for the consumer.
Nobody has stopped to think that on balance, a tax which was originally created to control the companies, is the most burden on all citizens.
Businesses, I just assumed a formality, with a simple declaration of VAT, returns.
However, where the consumer has no deductible, and go where you go or buy what you buy, you are paying a price that product far superior to what really matters.
And it affects all ordinary citizens, who do not have a business, those with fewer economic resources, retirees, workers, the majority ...
And no matter which is a staple or staples, although some products pay less percentage, yet are paid much, you pay more.
So, as the VAT, even more speculative others, with name, should take steps to stop this growth precios.Y is that VAT has to stop being another intermediary.
should stop high prices to consumers and should be taken in perspective to the companies on one side and the consumer otro.Es, if VAT is charged to companies and they charge other companies, I think it's great idea, as are the same and have the option of tax.
Well for that you created to control the companies.
But now comes the second part, the consumer.
To the consumer, would be taken into more consideration and is the biggest loser so far out.
And the solution is very simple, very simple ...
The consumer only and only had to pay the first tax and VAT not all of the other intermediaries through which the product has passed down to our hands.
I repeat for those who govern us, whether a political party or another, I do not care.
The consumer only and exclusively have to pay the first tax, which, the first VAT would be included in a section of bills, although that product has passed by a thousand hands, a thousand businesses, because that first VAT, which would have to pay the consumer. Take careful note
Lords of the Government of Spain, we the English, we want you to do things right, do not deceive us, defend us and when you see something wrong, or you've done or other wrong, correct them, that we, the English of a standing, not to blame for the mismanagement that have made each other rulers.
And believe me, this is one of the greatest evils that drag consumers and makes overflow prices.
take steps now, to charge the consumer only the first VAT, which we, the people will notice it and appreciate it.
Did no one think and head?
